ALOHA - D55

“I SAW HER AGAIN LAST NIGHT”

            The 2018 APAPO Practice Leadership Conference:   The APAPO State Leadership Conferences are always the highlight of the year.  Former APA Presidents James Bray and Carol Goodheart were present, joining an impressive cadre of Early Career Psychologists and APAGS graduate students.  This was Katherine Nordal’s final hurrah – the enthusiastic standing ovations she received for her decade of passionate service to APA were well deserved.  Psychology’s future is extraordinarily bright.  The next generation is dedicated to serving the nation in a transformative manner.

            “Thanks to the invitation by Dr. Dan Abrahamson, I attended the Practice Leadership Conference discussion group, ‘Social Justice & Advocacy Matters: Navigating ‘isms’ and Building Allies in SPTAs and Other Professional Settings’ hosted by the Diversity Delegate and facilitated by Dr. Charmain F. Jackman, the current Diversity Delegate Liaison.  As a sixth year doctoral candidate at the Uniformed Services University who studies health disparities, I have spent a great deal of time learning and practicing from a culturally-informed framework through classes, conferences, clinical work, and my own research.  However, this session was, by far, the best session I have ever attended at PLC and at any other class or conference I have ever attended.  Dr. Jackman used what is called the ‘fish bowl protocol’ to facilitate an authentic dialogue on social justice advocacy, navigating ‘isms’ (e.g., racism, sexism) and discrimination in the workplace, incorporating social justice into professional practice, and the roles of allies and ally-ship.

            “Within this protocol, there is an inner circle that consists of six chairs and an outer circle surrounding the inner circle.  At any given time, there are five members in the inner circle and everyone else sits in the outer circle.  There is one chair left empty in the inner circle so that someone from the outer circle can join the inner circle at any point.  Only five people can be in the inner circle at one time, so when someone joins the inner circle, one person must leave to maintain the five-person inner group.  Dr. Jackman presented several prompts throughout the 90-minute session to spur discussion that occurred amongst the people in the inner circle while the attendants in the outer circle listened.  Although, prior to starting, I was a bit nervous about how this protocol would function, it (along with her excellent prompts) made for one of the most intimate, authentic, eye opening, inspiring, empowering, and engaging discussions around personality identity, cultural identity, navigating ‘isms,’ and discrimination I have ever witnessed.

            “There were three prompts, but the first was, by far, my favorite and the one that was continuously woven throughout the others.  She asked the first set of discussants to share how they identify themselves and how their identities inform their professional practice.  Although the question might have been a simple one, the range, variety, passion, and history of the responses was far from it.  To respect the ‘Vegas rule’ we all agreed to prior to beginning the discussion, I will not go into detail about the responses.  I will only say that I was deeply moved by the complexity and depth of the responses, the surprises, the willingness to be authentic and brave, and the genuine and respectful curiosity exhibited by everyone in attendance.  As an African American woman who grew up in the South, I have always been aware of the racial and cultural tensions that exist and have certainly been on the receiving end of racism and discrimination.  However, I was still struck by the stories of people coming from so many races, cultures, religions, socioeconomic statuses, and backgrounds who have had similar and even more extreme experiences.

            “The paradox that exists within the human experience of having so much in common and yet being so different was ever present, and dare I say, beautiful to witness in its full glory.  Indeed, hearing and understanding people’s stories in this way was what initially drew me to the field of psychology.  The 90-minutes went by in a flash.  I felt like I could stay in that room forever.  I’m sure I wasn’t alone in that feeling.  At the end of the session, with just a couple of minutes left, our facilitator asked everyone to share what they got out of the session in one word.  Again, I wasn’t sure if this would work, but boy was I wrong.  Not only was it easy, it was powerful.  The diversity in discussion was matched by the diversity in what everyone’s response was to this request – all the discussants and those of us who didn’t participate but were there to bear witness and honor their stories.  The one-word descriptions were endless, with very few repeats.  We all got something a little different from the session – all beautiful, powerful, and valid.  My word was ‘empowering’ because I left feeling even more confident in the personal and professional work I am pursuing and the personal work I encourage my clients to pursue.  Dr. Jackman (and her team) did a fabulous job putting together this session, and it will undoubtedly inform the way I see others forever” (Omni Cassidy).

            Presidential Citations:  One of the most enjoyable moments of serving as APA President is having the opportunity to publicly recognize colleagues who have made a significant difference in the lives of our nation’s citizenry.  This year two of the pioneering visionaries behind the prescriptive authority (RxP) movement were so recognized: former APA Practice Directorate State Association guru Mike Sullivan by Jessica Daniels and former APA and Division 55 President Ron Fox by Tony Puente.  Unfortunately, Ron passed away this March; however, during his final days, Tony was able to visit him at home and personally present his Citation, which was Tony’s last official act as our national President.  For so many years, Mike was APA’s state advocate – traveling across the country to visit and encourage those seriously considering RxP legislation.  It was most fitting, therefore, that at this year’s APAPO Practice Leadership Conference Jessica was able to honor him.  Without question, but for the efforts of these two dedicated colleagues, the Division and our prescriptive authority quest would never have come to life.  Those of us who believe that obtaining this clinical authority is in the best interest of our profession and our patients owe each of them so much, and yet they asked for so little in return.  Mahalo.

            Mike Sullivan:  “Dr. Michael Sullivan is recognized with this APA Citizen Psychologist Presidential citation as an examplar of sustained activities in his community and across the lifespan.  From his time volunteering in the Peace Corps and later doing alternative civilian service as a conscientious objector in the 1960’s to his current volunteerism 50 years later, Dr. Sullivan brings the same passion and commitment to his community as he did in his many years of service to the State Advocacy Office in the APA Practice Directorate.  Dr. Sullivan has dedicated many volunteer hours to the Meals on Wheels program within Senior Resources, Inc. in support of improving the lives of seniors in Columbia, South Carolina.  He initiated a volunteer recognition initiative within the program to ensure that those who cared for others are also cared for.

            “Dr. Sullivan also applies his psychology advocacy skills as a spokesperson for the Meals on Wheels program addressing the benefits of community engagement for volunteers.  He sees volunteerism as a noble calling which provides him meaning and purpose in retirement by giving back to his community.  By providing meals to homebound and disabled citizens in the Richland County area of South Carolina, Dr. Sullivan appreciates the importance of enabling seniors to live at home rather than in an institution and how human interaction and wellness checks are equally as important to ensuring the safety and well-being of seniors.

            “Dr. Sullivan volunteers in other capacities in his community to include his work at Howlmore Animal Sanctuary exercising special-needs dogs and teaching line dancing with his wife through various local organizations, including a local homeless shelter.  His church has also recognized Dr. Sullivan for his leadership, social justice, and social action work.”

Ron Fox:  “On the closing of the American Psychological Association’s 125^th anniversary, I, Antonio E. Puente, as President of our venerable society bestow upon Ronald E. Fox this APA Presidential citation on December 31, 2017.  From humble beginnings to being President of our great association, Ron Fox has been driven with a vision of making our world a better place through making the profession of psychology a central change agent.  His long and illustrious career has spanned several decades and various settings including as a clinician, a professor, and an advocate for the profession of psychology.  Starting early in his career, Dr. Fox stood firmly for ethnic-minorities, for women, and for the poor, when such advocacy was considered unimportant.

            “Within APA, he has held numerous governance positions from committee member to being President, and a trustee of the Insurance Trust.  Dr. Fox has been a pioneer in so many venues that it is impossible to list them all.  But here are some important illustrations: key in establishing the APA Practice Directorate, Division 29 (Psychotherapy), Division 55 (Psychopharmacology), and the Association of Psychology Postdoctoral and Internship Centers (APPIC).  He advocated in Ohio for the founding of one of the first Doctor of Psychology programs in the U.S.  Dr. Fox was instrumental in establishing one of the first psychology licensing boards in the U.S. (Ohio).  In addition, he is considered the ‘grandfather’ for prescription authority in psychology.

            “Ron Fox has been a calm, steady, and reasoned voice for all of psychology for almost half a century.  For his efforts, his resiliency, his vision, and the many results that have made the profession of psychology what it is today, on this last day of APA’s 125^th anniversary, let it be known that Ronald E. Fox is presented this APA Presidential Citation.”  Aloha,

Pat DeLeon, former APA President – Division 55 – March, 2018

ALOHA - Div 18

THE CONTINUING HIGHLIGHT OF THE YEAR

            We recently had the opportunity to attend the 2018 APAPO Practice Leadership Conference, joining 350 colleagues from all over the nation and Columbia.  This was Executive Director for Professional Practice Katherine Nordal’s farewell event – Advancing Practice Together and her opportunity to formally introduce Arthur Evans, APA’s new CEO, to the leadership of our State and Territorial psychological associations – the backbone of professional practice.  At the Opening Session there was a solemn moment of silence for our California VA colleagues who were killed earlier that week, serving those who had placed themselves in “Harm’s Way.”  Then the enthusiasm in the room and the genuine appreciation and gratitude that those assembled felt for Katherine’s extraordinary decade of service at APA spontaneously burst forth.

The Times They Are A-Changing:  Our profession is undergoing an unprecedented transformation, as is the nation’s entire health care system.  As Katherine touched upon the highlights of her journey at APA – achieving mental health parity, protecting against proposed Medicare and Medicaid cuts which would have negatively impacted psychology’s patients, fighting for increasing psychology’s recognition at the federal and local level, etc. -- she made it clear that she had enjoyed creating the type of disruption within the profession that ultimately allowed us to believe in ourselves and remove our historical blinders, in order to move the profession to a higher level of accomplishment.  She stressed that psychology will only achieve its true potential by addressing society’s real needs and by appreciating that we can indeed make people and society healthier and happier.  Psychology does save lives.  Katherine was clear that Arthur Evans was absolutely the right person for psychology at this point in time and was very optimistic about the future.  For me personally, the State Leadership conferences are the highlight of the year and this year’s 35^th was no exception.  If you have the opportunity to represent your state, I would strongly recommend it.  It is an exhilarating experience.

Several major themes were consistently expressed throughout the conference, such as the importance of developing genuine personal relationships at the local level with our state and federal elected officials.  I was particularly pleased to be in the audience for Doug Walter’s “Inside Congress and the 2018 Mid-Year Political Landscape” political plenary session where the chiefs of staff for Senators Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND) and Michael Crapo (R-ID) shared their extensive experiences on The Hill.  The importance of bi-partisan collaboration, hiring excellent staff and then staying out of their way, and having a long-term vision have not changed since I was there.  Having a conversation with colleagues, and thereby building trusting relationships, remains the key to success.  Money is unquestionably important in the political process; however, very few legislative staff are actually aware of who makes contributions.  At the luncheon awards program the recipient, a Nebraska State Senator, made the same points -- stressing how his psychology constituents have been with him from the very beginning and how they are constantly educating him regarding psychology’s contributions to early childhood education and juvenile justice programs.  As a businessman-banker he was very impressed by the cost-effectiveness of prevention initiatives, particularly for those on the verge of entering the prison system.  Again, long term relationships are the key to access and influence.

Prescriptive Authority (RxP):  Beth Rom-Rymer, currently serving on the APA Board of Directors, chaired one of the concurrent workshops: “The Revolution in Health Care: Prescribing Psychologists.”  The excitement for the future was palpable, as first-hand descriptions of the various successful models adopted by New Mexico, Louisiana, Illinois, Iowa, and Idaho were described.  Renee Willkins from New Mexico reported that they now have 10 prescribing psychologists who have been in practice for over a decade; she and Darlyne Nemeth of Louisiana reported that to their knowledge, there have been no reported complaints to their respective licensing boards.  Further, they both emphatically addressed the reoccurring concern that those who obtained RxP might lose their psychology identity by stating that simply was not correct.  All of their prescribing colleagues saw themselves first as psychologists and appreciated how they were able to significantly improve the lives of their patients, frequently by modifying previous medication orders.  Each successful state had adopted a legislative strategy that was unique to their own circumstances and especially the pressing needs of their rural citizens.

“What is particularly unique is that Illinois graduate students are flocking to the Chicago School of Professional Psychology to earn a Master’s degree in Clinical Psychopharmacology alongside their doctoral degrees in Psychology.  It is really exciting that the APA Committee, chosen to review the Clinical Psychopharmacology curriculum for prescribing psychology trainees, has recommended that APA approve the training of graduate students in Clinical Psychopharmacology.  This recommendation would give significant impetus to those thousands of graduate students, around the country, who are passionate about becoming psychologists and who believe that having prescriptive authority would give them greater access to a wider range of tools to be utilized in treatment” (Beth Rom-Rymer).

            The Master’s Issue:  One far-reaching accomplishment by the Council of Representatives, which met that same week in our nation’s Capital, was highlighted at the APAPO conference.  “APA is currently recognized by the United States Secretary of Education to accredit doctoral, internship, and postdoctoral programs in psychology.  At the March 2018 APA Council of Representatives meeting a motion was overwhelmingly approved to pursue accreditation of master’s level programs in psychology in areas where APA accreditation now applies (clinical, counseling, school, and combinations thereof).  Factors that were considered in making this decision include the growth in the number of master’s degrees awarded in psychology by 40% in both health service and research subfields between 2006 and 2016 and the importance of master’s programs in ensuring the viability of doctoral programs.  Furthermore, graduates with master’s degrees in psychology are facing increasing challenges to get credentialed for practice secondary to advocacy efforts to restrict the professional counselor credential to those who have graduated from a program accredited by the Council on Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP).  This challenge has grown despite the existence of a separate accreditation system for psychology graduates (the Master’s in Psychology and Counseling Accreditation Council).

“It is important to note that this action was taken with the continued recognition of the doctorate is the minimum educational requirement for entry into professional practice as a psychologist.  Next steps will include developing a proposal regarding the decision-making structure of the accrediting body, how that body will need to be developed in accordance with current APA policies, scope of accreditation for that body, a timeframe to develop standards, policies, and procedures for program review, timeframe to seek recognition (federal and or non-federal), and infrastructure issues” (Catherine Grus).  This is a critical issue for all of psychology which was discussed in depth by Linda Campbell and her colleagues at last year’s annual convention.  When I served as APA President in 2000, we seriously explored various potential options.  However, at that time it was not possible to develop the necessary consensus for action.  Substantive change always takes time, often far longer than one might anticipate.

            The American Academy of Nursing:  Long-time psychology colleague Angelia McBride, Dean Emerita of the Indiana-Purdue University School of Nursing and a Nursing “Living Legend,” invited me to serve on the AAN-Institute for Nursing Leadership National Advisory Council.  Their Advisory Council met the same week as State Leadership and it was inspiring to participate in very similar discussions with nursing’s leadership regarding how to best serve society and bring their considerable expertise to the table in addressing such societal priorities as decreasing violence, especially within our nation’s schools.  As Angie emphasized during their deliberations, the public policy process requires interdisciplinary collaboration.  Mahalo, Katherine Nordal -- Psychology’s “Living Legend.”  Aloha,

Pat DeLeon, former APA President – Division 18 – March, 2018

 

AS THERE IS NO CURE, THERE SEEMS NO PLACE FOR A DOCTOR’S SKILL

   Interprofessional Dialogue:  One of the most enjoyable aspects of being involved with the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine is the opportunity to interact with colleagues from a wide range of disciplines while addressing issues that are of importance to our nation.  This year I was fortunate to have been appointed to the NAM Culture of Health Program Advisory Committee and received a copy of the Academies' intriguing 2017 report Communities in action: Pathways to health equity.  Coming from a psychology-legal orientation, there are elements of their report that I would enthusiastically endorse; and not surprisingly, there are perspectives expressed which with which I am admittedly less comfortable.  Highlights:

            "Health equity is the state in which everyone has the opportunity to attain full health potential and no one is disadvantaged from achieving this potential because of social position or any other socially defined circumstance.  Health equity and opportunity are inextricably linked.  Currently in the United States, the burdens of disease and poor health and the benefits of well-being and good health are inequitably distributed.  This inequitable distribution is caused by social, environmental, economic, and structural factors that shape health and are themselves distributed unequally, with pronounced differences in opportunities for health."

            The report notes that health equity is fundamental to a good life and a vibrant society due to its practical, economic, and civic implications.  Further, health inequity is very costly.  It is estimated that eliminating health disparities for minorities would have resulted in reduced direct medical care costs by nearly $230 billion for the years 2003-2006.  From a national security perspective, nearly one third (32 percent) of all young people experience health problems – other than their weight – that would keep them from serving in the military.  Infant mortality, age-adjusted death rates, and life expectancy are considered critical to judging the overall health of a population.  In international rankings, the U.S. ranks lower than other wealthy nations on each of these indicators – while spending considerably more.

            The Academies' report identified nine social determinants of health: education, employment, health systems and services, housing, income and wealth, physical environment, public safety, social environment, and transportation.  "Based on its review of the evidence, the committee concludes that health inequities are the result of more than individual choice or random occurrence.  They are the result of the historic and ongoing interplay of inequitable structures, policies, and norms that shape lives."  And, "In the committee's judgment, civil rights approaches have helped mitigate the negative impacts of many forms of social and health discrimination.  Continuing this work is needed to overcome discrimination and the structural barriers that affect health."

            Where I do have a different perspective from that of the committee on achievable priorities relates to their conclusion: "For many years researchers, public health practitioners, and others have known that health status in this country and around the world is determined as much by socioeconomic as biologic or behavioral factors.  Despite that recognition, approaches to improving health status and health outcomes have narrowly centered on improving medical interventions, technologies, systems, and access.  Beyond clinical approaches, some health promotion strategies have focused on changing behavior, despite the robust evidence indicating that they are ineffective in addressing health inequities.  Although these strategies play a role in improving population health, it has become amply clear that they are necessary but not sufficient.  Health is the result of much more than health care; the social, economic, environmental and structural factors – for example, education, poverty, housing, and structural racism – that shape health outcomes also create health inequities.  Addressing and putting an end to health inequities will only be possible if society and decision makers broaden their view of health to fully grasp how steep and unjust disparities in social and other conditions limit, thwart, and even destroy some people's ability to live healthy and full lives."  From my perspective, the committee did not go far enough in recognizing and reaching out to psychology and a number of other disciplines which can, and shall, contribute significantly to this important dialogue.

            Interprofessional Collaboration:  Ken Pope recently shared with us a John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health comparison of the quality of physician, Nurse Practitioner (NP), and Physician Assistant (PA) prescribing protocols, covering over 700,000 patient visits.  They examined 13 quality indicators across a range of chronic diseases, including antibiotic use and concurrent prescription of contraindicated medications.  The conclusion: the quality of prescribing was similar across the board and while there was room for improvement in all of their indicators, no one discipline was more likely than another to be nonadherent with guidelines.  NPs and PAs continue to be one solution to physician shortages, with data such as this providing support for their growing autonomy and prescriptive authority.

            "Over the past few years, the Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) program and the Psychology program at the Uniformed Services University (USU) have increasingly engaged in interprofessional education activities.  Our first effort was our joint Health Policy class exposing graduate students from both disciplines to a wide range of accomplished speakers describing their personal journeys.  These included APA's Heather Kelly and Steve Behnke; former APA Presidents Ron Fox, Barry Anton, and Don Bersoff; current and former Surgeon Generals and VA Secretaries; as well as a former Prisoner of War.  Dialogue between our disciplines increased and psychology faculty began assisting with topics in the GSN Therapeutic Modalities course, including presentations on cognitive behavioral therapy and biofeedback.  Psychology faculty and graduate students have helped supervise DNP students at the university's simulation center.  Students from both programs train together and are placed in joint teams at Operation Bushmaster, a large scale simulated operational field training exercise, where they see simulated mental health patients, perform a mock unit needs assessment, and assist with operational stress control.  Psychology students are invited to participate in our Wilderness Medicine field experiences.  Most recently, GSN faculty were selected to teach in the psychopharmacology course for clinical psychology students.  We are now working to start a joint psychotropic interest group, which will involve case-based presentations, and to collaborate on leadership development" [CDR Eric Pauli, USN, NC].

            "I am thrilled to see that the APA Committee, formed to review the Clinical Psychopharmacology Curriculum for prescribing psychology trainees, has recommended that the didactic training can be done at the graduate, predoctoral level.  Certainly, our Illinois graduate students are thrilled with the opportunity to do their training in Clinical Psychopharmacology, as a joint Master's degree, alongside their doctorate in Psychology.  It is most satisfying that our profession continues to move forward, striving to meet the needs of our psychology students as well as the needs of our larger community" [Beth Rom-Rymer, APA Board of Directors, Council Leadership Team].  In enacting the 2014 Illinois Psychological Association RxP legislation, Beth and her colleagues worked tirelessly in developing a broad based, interprofessional coalition enthusiastically supporting their bill on behalf of the entire community.  [Father Damien].  Aloha,

Pat DeLeon, former APA President – HPA – March, 2018

 

Sent from my iPhone

ALOHA - HPA

“AS THERE IS NO CURE, THERE SEEMS NO PLACE FOR A DOCTOR’S SKILL”

            Interprofessional Dialogue:  One of the most enjoyable aspects of being involved with the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine is the opportunity to interact with colleagues from a wide range of disciplines while addressing issues that are of importance to our nation.  This year I was fortunate to have been appointed to the NAM Culture of Health Program Advisory Committee and received a copy of the Academies’ intriguing 2017 report Communities in action: Pathways to health equity.  Coming from a psychology-legal orientation, there are elements of their report that I would enthusiastically endorse; and not surprisingly, there are perspectives expressed which with which I am admittedly less comfortable.  Highlights:

            “Health equity is the state in which everyone has the opportunity to attain full health potential and no one is disadvantaged from achieving this potential because of social position or any other socially defined circumstance.  Health equity and opportunity are inextricably linked.  Currently in the United States, the burdens of disease and poor health and the benefits of well-being and good health are inequitably distributed.  This inequitable distribution is caused by social, environmental, economic, and structural factors that shape health and are themselves distributed unequally, with pronounced differences in opportunities for health.”

            The report notes that health equity is fundamental to a good life and a vibrant society due to its practical, economic, and civic implications.  Further, health inequity is very costly.  It is estimated that eliminating health disparities for minorities would have resulted in reduced direct medical care costs by nearly $230 billion for the years 2003-2006.  From a national security perspective, nearly one third (32 percent) of all young people experience health problems – other than their weight – that would keep them from serving in the military.  Infant mortality, age-adjusted death rates, and life expectancy are considered critical to judging the overall health of a population.  In international rankings, the U.S. ranks lower than other wealthy nations on each of these indicators – while spending considerably more.

            The Academies’ report identified nine social determinants of health: education, employment, health systems and services, housing, income and wealth, physical environment, public safety, social environment, and transportation.  “Based on its review of the evidence, the committee concludes that health inequities are the result of more than individual choice or random occurrence.  They are the result of the historic and ongoing interplay of inequitable structures, policies, and norms that shape lives.”  And, “In the committee’s judgment, civil rights approaches have helped mitigate the negative impacts of many forms of social and health discrimination.  Continuing this work is needed to overcome discrimination and the structural barriers that affect health.”

            Where I do have a different perspective from that of the committee on achievable priorities relates to their conclusion: “For many years researchers, public health practitioners, and others have known that health status in this country and around the world is determined as much by socioeconomic as biologic or behavioral factors.  Despite that recognition, approaches to improving health status and health outcomes have narrowly centered on improving medical interventions, technologies, systems, and access.  Beyond clinical approaches, some health promotion strategies have focused on changing behavior, despite the robust evidence indicating that they are ineffective in addressing health inequities.  Although these strategies play a role in improving population health, it has become amply clear that they are necessary but not sufficient.  Health is the result of much more than health care; the social, economic, environmental and structural factors – for example, education, poverty, housing, and structural racism – that shape health outcomes also create health inequities.  Addressing and putting an end to health inequities will only be possible if society and decision makers broaden their view of health to fully grasp how steep and unjust disparities in social and other conditions limit, thwart, and even destroy some people’s ability to live healthy and full lives.”  From my perspective, the committee did not go far enough in recognizing and reaching out to psychology and a number of other disciplines which can, and shall, contribute significantly to this important dialogue.

            Interprofessional Collaboration:  Ken Pope recently shared with us a John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health comparison of the quality of physician, Nurse Practitioner (NP), and Physician Assistant (PA) prescribing protocols, covering over 700,000 patient visits.  They examined 13 quality indicators across a range of chronic diseases, including antibiotic use and concurrent prescription of contraindicated medications.  The conclusion: the quality of prescribing was similar across the board and while there was room for improvement in all of their indicators, no one discipline was more likely than another to be nonadherent with guidelines.  NPs and PAs continue to be one solution to physician shortages, with data such as this providing support for their growing autonomy and prescriptive authority.

            “Over the past few years, the Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) program and the Psychology program at the Uniformed Services University (USU) have increasingly engaged in interprofessional education activities.  Our first effort was our joint Health Policy class exposing graduate students from both disciplines to a wide range of accomplished speakers describing their personal journeys.  These included APA’s Heather Kelly and Steve Behnke; former APA Presidents Ron Fox, Barry Anton, and Don Bersoff; current and former Surgeon Generals and VA Secretaries; as well as a former Prisoner of War.  Dialogue between our disciplines increased and psychology faculty began assisting with topics in the GSN Therapeutic Modalities course, including presentations on cognitive behavioral therapy and biofeedback.  Psychology faculty and graduate students have helped supervise DNP students at the university’s simulation center.  Students from both programs train together and are placed in joint teams at Operation Bushmaster, a large scale simulated operational field training exercise, where they see simulated mental health patients, perform a mock unit needs assessment, and assist with operational stress control.  Psychology students are invited to participate in our Wilderness Medicine field experiences.  Most recently, GSN faculty were selected to teach in the psychopharmacology course for clinical psychology students.  We are now working to start a joint psychotropic interest group, which will involve case-based presentations, and to collaborate on leadership development” [CDR Eric Pauli, USN, NC].

            “I am thrilled to see that the APA Committee, formed to review the Clinical Psychopharmacology Curriculum for prescribing psychology trainees, has recommended that the didactic training can be done at the graduate, predoctoral level.  Certainly, our Illinois graduate students are thrilled with the opportunity to do their training in Clinical Psychopharmacology, as a joint Master’s degree, alongside their doctorate in Psychology.  It is most satisfying that our profession continues to move forward, striving to meet the needs of our psychology students as well as the needs of our larger community” [Beth Rom-Rymer, APA Board of Directors, Council Leadership Team].  In enacting the 2014 Illinois Psychological Association RxP legislation, Beth and her colleagues worked tirelessly in developing a broad based, interprofessional coalition enthusiastically supporting their bill on behalf of the entire community.  [Father Damien].  Aloha,

Pat DeLeon, former APA President – HPA – March, 2018